Taylor Carson
In Plain Sight: Gustave Caillebotte's Impressionist Rebellion
In Paris, France, the mid-19th century was a time marked by significant socio-political change. Emperor Napoleon III came to power during a period marked by class conflict and civilian discontent, and by 1870 had redesigned his empire around a city made new: Paris. The now familiar boulevards and apartments were then a beacon of modernization and opulence, reflecting the wealth of its upper-class populace as the Industrial Revolution pushed the seat of economic power out of rural farms and into urban streets. Leisure and affluence became the standard for Parisian life and art, but underneath the glamor remained the working class, whose call for equality had long gone unanswered. In the 1850s, Realist painters like Jean-François Millet and Gustave Courbet answered this call, creating works that rejected The Salon’s ideas of acceptable subjects and centered rural workers, but as Realism began to give way to the new wave of Impressionism, the working class were largely ignored in favor of natural landscapes and depictions of leisure activities. Among these Impressionists stood Gustave Caillebotte. Born into an influential upper-class Parisian family in 1848, Caillebotte spent his youth summering in Yerres and was precisely the type one would expect to follow the status quo. Caillebotte’s art depicted the world around him, in a way that reflected his love of photography. Rather than obscuring the less glamorous aspects of Parisian life–the labor and laborers–Caillebotte represented and even centered them. One of his most well-known works, The Floor Scrapers, did just that, using the upscale setting to shine a light on a type of labor generally unseen and unthanked. Much like the Realists before him, Gustave Caillebotte pushed back against the boundaries of the world around him and forged his own path, again giving voice to those who were essential in maintaining upper-class Paris.
Jean-François Millet’s The Gleaners is a classic example of art that centers the working class. Set in rural France, the painting features three women in the midst of literally back breaking work as they glean a field. The field owner can be seen in the background, but the women are the main focus of the work. Millet portrays them in a way that highlights the difficult nature of their job, contrasting the delicate way women were usually portrayed in 19th century art. The Gleaners was rejected by many in the upper echelons of French art society because Millet’s choice in a large canvas defied the strict rules set in place, which said that only “higher” subjects should be painted on large canvases. Millet wasn’t the first or the last painter to use his art to highlight class conflicts, but this work had great influence on the French art world and would go on to inspire artists like Gustave Caillebotte.
The Floor Scrapers is one of Caillebotte’s most well known works, and it’s a great example of how he, like Millet, uses his art to highlight the working class, although here we see urban workers in Paris rather than in a rural field. This work is particularly interesting in that the scene is set in a clearly upscale apartment. The wallpapering is ornate and stylish, and out the back window one can see the iron railing of a Haussmann-style balcony. However, the room is not the focus and only serves as a backdrop for the subject: the floor scrapers. Three men shown in the middle of their work. Here, their normally unseen labor is given center stage, and Caillebotte has created a scene that celebrates the type of skills most upper-class Parisians would have considered to be lowly work.
Caillebotte’s Man at His Bath provides an example of how Caillebotte’s interest in photography affected his paintings. This work shows a simple image of a man drying off after his bath, but the significance of the painting is in its subject. In the Impressionist era, nude figures in art were not uncommon. What was unusual was Caillebotte’s choice of a male nude, as opposed to a female one. Impressionists tended to create more composed, idealized male figures that resembled high society gentlemen. Caillebotte instead depicts a casual and realistic, if not private, moment. The plain room and simple clothing hint that this man is likely of a lower class. In another break from typical Impressionist conventions, Caillebotte’s passion for photography caused his art to lean a bit more Realist in style, leading to these snapshots of everyday life that revealed the truth of the world around him.
The Europe Bridge is another work that lends from Caillebotte’s interest in photography. This work shows a scene of a Paris bridge with many people leisurely strolling along. Several Haussmann apartments can be seen in the background, and most of the people are wearing clothing typical of the middle and upper-class. The idle nature of the left side of the painting is strongly contrasted by the dominant metal structure on the right, which is part of the bridge the scene is set on. While Caillebotte’s use of perspective and framing here are strongly inspired by photography, this painting also serves as another example of how Caillebotte’s work depicted the reality of 1870s Paris. During this time the Industrial Revolution was well under way, causing a massive increase in industrial infrastructure like the railways under the bridge, which can also be partially seen. The upgrades of Haussmann Paris allowed for many artists to set their works in idyllic urban parks and along stretches of boulevards, creating an image of a city that was untouched by the less attractive aspects of modernization. The Europe Bridge was a true representation of Paris as the economic center that it was.
Another one of Caillebotte’s more well known works is Paris Street; Rainy Day, another Parisian urban scene. This work is one of Caillebotte’s more Realist-style paintings, and was, like many of his works, inspired by photographic perspectives. In fact, Paris Street; Rainy Day is just one example of Caillebotte’s flickering art style, as he wavered throughout his career between more Impressionistic and Realistic styles. Despite the variations in technique, his subjects largely stayed the same, and here we have yet another scene of Paris that shows the reality of the city. Although most of the image is dominated by the middle-class people walking along the street, in the background there are several working class people who are shown as they were: a normal part of Parisian life. The man carrying a ladder and the maid under a doorway are not the main subjects of this work, nor are they particularly noticeable. But their inclusion shows that Caillebotte’s desire to reflect the reality of the world transcends through artistic styles and touches many of his works.